A formal evidence: Reckless to Terrorism

If you send a fax to a police station and ask: “Have you received my letter of report about a Bomb which I have sent you few days ago?” if police has not received your report, should the police officer contact you:

A. As soon as receives your fax B. 1 hour after receiving your fax

C. next day D. 1 week later E. 1 month later F. 38 days later

Which answer is correct? Which option is not reckless to terrorist acts?

The attached document is an evidence which proves that the government of PM John Howard has been reckless about terrorist acts in Australia.

On Friday 27 July 2007 ,before APEC, Sheikh Haron has sent a report about terrorist acts in Australia to Attorney-General Mr. Philip Ruddock by registered mail. He again on Tuesday 7 August 2007 has sent a facsimile to Mr. Philip Ruddock questioning him whether or not he had received his report about terrorist acts, 38 days later Mr. Philip Ruddock has answered that “No , could you please resend your report”.

So Mr. Philip Ruddock before APEC knew there was a terrorist acts report that he had not received it and he didn't know what was the details of the terrorist acts, it could have been planning to explode Sydney during APEC or a plan to highjack a plane or something like Glasgow airport attack that Dr. Mohammad Haneef was accused for being reckless or it could have been anything else but he didn't immediately contact the reporter on the same day to ask: “What was that terrorist report? Was it something urgent?”.

He contacted the reporter 38 days later, on Friday14 September 2007. unbelievable!